Chicago
Player | Procedure | Rehab Time | Possible Return Dates |
V. Martinez | Removal of bone chips in right (throwing) elbow | 6 - 8 weeks | July 26 - August 9 |
T. Hafner | Muscle strengthening program for rotator cuff and right shoulder | 4 - 6 weeks (rough estimate) | July 17 - July 31 (rough estimate) |
J. Barfield | Surgery on left, middle finger ligament | 6 - 8 weeks | July 29 - August 12 |
When I really wanted to put something on a swing, I wasn't able. Every time I tried to get extension, I felt a sharp pain in my elbow. Man, it was tough. It's tough to play like that.
Recovery varies from one week to several months, depending on the extent of the surgery. Most patients can return to heavy work and sports within three to six weeks of surgery if the procedure is minor. However, three to six months is often required for complete recovery.
I’d like to provide a similar take on Hafner, but it’s difficult to say at what point he was truly healthy this season, if at all. How far back has his shoulder bothered him to the point of being a handicap on his swing? The outlook did not sound optimistic and Hafner is currently behind in his strength training program. The latest report says Hafner “has improved the strength in his injured right shoulder 15 percent since his last assessment two weeks ago, but it still remains just 45-50 percent as strong as his left shoulder."
2008 CHONE Projections
Player | AB | HR | HR/AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
T. Hafner | 499 | 29 | 0.06 | .279 | .402 | .515 | .917 |
G. Sizemore | 602 | 23 | 0.04 | .287 | .387 | .488 | .876 |
V. Martinez | 539 | 20 | 0.04 | .286 | .370 | .462 | .832 |
R. Garko | 505 | 19 | 0.04 | .267 | .347 | .440 | .787 |
J. Peralta | 544 | 19 | 0.03 | .270 | .347 | .438 | .785 |
C. Blake | 514 | 19 | 0.04 | .255 | .330 | .428 | .758 |
D. Dellucci | 274 | 10 | 0.04 | .237 | .332 | .409 | .741 |
B. Francisco | 467 | 13 | 0.03 | .261 | .318 | .413 | .731 |
A. Marte | 464 | 16 | 0.03 | .246 | .311 | .414 | .725 |
F. Gutierrez | 441 | 12 | 0.03 | .259 | .317 | .404 | .721 |
S. Choo | 474 | 9 | 0.02 | .259 | .335 | .382 | .717 |
A. Cabrera | 527 | 7 | 0.01 | .258 | .322 | .370 | .692 |
K. Shoppach | 253 | 10 | 0.04 | .225 | .295 | .395 | .690 |
J. Carroll | 373 | 3 | 0.01 | .241 | .326 | .314 | .640 |
Average: | 0.03 | .259 | .337 | .419 | .756 |
Actual 2008 Season Stats as of June 28
Player | AB | HR | HR/AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
G. Sizemore | 301 | 17 | 0.06 | .262 | .368 | .505 | .873 |
S. Choo | 59 | 2 | 0.03 | .271 | .392 | .475 | .867 |
B. Francisco | 179 | 5 | 0.03 | .291 | .347 | .458 | .805 |
C. Blake | 246 | 7 | 0.03 | .268 | .339 | .431 | .770 |
K. Shoppach | 122 | 5 | 0.04 | .246 | .319 | .443 | .762 |
J. Carroll | 157 | 0 | 0.00 | .293 | .378 | .369 | .747 |
J. Peralta | 279 | 11 | 0.04 | .244 | .293 | .427 | .720 |
D. Dellucci | 183 | 7 | 0.04 | .219 | .304 | .388 | .692 |
R. Garko | 249 | 6 | 0.02 | .249 | .333 | .357 | .690 |
T. Hafner | 157 | 4 | 0.03 | .217 | .326 | .350 | .676 |
V. Martinez | 198 | 0 | 0.00 | .278 | .332 | .333 | .665 |
F. Gutierrez | 189 | 3 | 0.02 | .233 | .282 | .344 | .626 |
A. Cabrera | 158 | 1 | 0.01 | .184 | .282 | .247 | .529 |
A. Marte | 51 | 0 | 0.00 | .137 | .185 | .157 | .342 |
Average: | 0.02 | .242 | .319 | .377 | .696 |
It's no surprise that Sizemore is leading the way on offense, but to see Choo and Francisco sporting the second and third best OPS on the team (by a sizable margin) was unexpected. Choo has responded well to the Majors since coming back from Tommy John surgery. Choo had a .846 OPS in 146 AB in 2006, so his current production is certainly within his means. Choo is a much needed addition to right field, as Gutierrez has been a disappointment so far (.430 OPS in June).
Another unexpected savior of the offense has been Ben Francisco. CHONE projected him with a modest rookie season with 13 HR, a .318 OBP, and a .413 SLG, but Ben is having a breakout season. While he's not blowing the doors off, Ben has made a smooth transition from his MVP season in Buffalo with 5 HR and a .291, .347, .458 line.
The production from Choo, Francisco, and Carroll (.856 OPS) this month is largely negated by ongoing slumps from guys like Peralta (.637 OPS) and Garko (.660 OPS), who were supposed to be primary contributors this season.
Difference Between Actual and CHONE Averages
Player | HR/AB | BA | OPS |
T. Hafner | -0.03 | -0.062 | -0.241 |
G. Sizemore | 0.02 | -0.025 | -0.003 |
V. Martinez | -0.04 | -0.008 | -0.167 |
R. Garko | -0.01 | -0.018 | -0.097 |
J. Peralta | 0.00 | -0.026 | -0.065 |
C. Blake | -0.01 | 0.013 | 0.012 |
D. Dellucci | 0.00 | -0.018 | -0.049 |
B. Francisco | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.074 |
A. Marte | -0.03 | -0.109 | -0.383 |
F. Gutierrez | -0.01 | -0.026 | -0.095 |
S. Choo | 0.01 | 0.012 | 0.150 |
A. Cabrera | -0.01 | -0.074 | -0.163 |
K. Shoppach | 0.00 | 0.021 | 0.072 |
J. Carroll | -0.01 | 0.052 | 0.107 |
Total Difference: | -0.11 | -0.238 | -0.848 |
This table just highlights the number of players who are currently underachieving, according to their anticipated production for 2008.
Below are a few scenarios based on the actual and projected stats:
Optimized Lineup Using Available Players
Player | AB | HR | HR/AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
G. Sizemore | 602 | 23 | 0.04 | .287 | .387 | .488 | .876 |
S. Choo* | 59 | 2 | 0.03 | .271 | .392 | .475 | .867 |
B. Francisco* | 179 | 5 | 0.03 | .291 | .347 | .458 | .805 |
R. Garko | 505 | 19 | 0.04 | .267 | .347 | .440 | .787 |
J. Peralta | 544 | 19 | 0.03 | .270 | .347 | .438 | .785 |
C. Blake* | 246 | 7 | 0.03 | .268 | .339 | .431 | .770 |
K. Shoppach* | 122 | 5 | 0.04 | .246 | .319 | .443 | .762 |
J. Carroll* | 157 | 0 | 0.00 | .293 | .378 | .369 | .747 |
D. Dellucci | 274 | 10 | 0.04 | .237 | .332 | .409 | .741 |
A. Marte | 464 | 16 | 0.03 | .246 | .311 | .414 | .725 |
F. Gutierrez | 441 | 12 | 0.03 | .259 | .317 | .404 | .721 |
Average: | 0.03 | .266 | .346 | .433 | .779 |
This table lists the current stats of players who are significantly outperforming their CHONE projections, as indicated by an asterisk. If you combine these overachievers with the expected (CHONE) numbers for the rest of the current roster (minus Martinez and Hafner) you end up with a pretty potent offense. This "optimized" lineup has a difference of .083 OPS points compared to the actual lineup listed at the top. Again, this is a fairly unrealistic lineup as long-slumping players would have to break out in the second half in addition to some hot hitting from Francisco and company.
Actual Stats Plus Hafner and Martinez CHONE Projections
Player | AB | HR | HR/AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
T. Hafner* | 499 | 29 | 0.06 | .279 | .402 | .515 | .917 |
G. Sizemore | 301 | 17 | 0.06 | .262 | .368 | .505 | .873 |
S. Choo | 59 | 2 | 0.03 | .271 | .392 | .475 | .867 |
V. Martinez* | 539 | 20 | 0.04 | .286 | .370 | .462 | .832 |
B. Francisco | 179 | 5 | 0.03 | .291 | .347 | .458 | .805 |
C. Blake | 246 | 7 | 0.03 | .268 | .339 | .431 | .770 |
K. Shoppach | 122 | 5 | 0.04 | .246 | .319 | .443 | .762 |
J. Carroll | 157 | 0 | 0.00 | .293 | .378 | .369 | .747 |
J. Peralta | 279 | 11 | 0.04 | .244 | .293 | .427 | .720 |
D. Dellucci | 183 | 7 | 0.04 | .219 | .304 | .388 | .692 |
R. Garko | 249 | 6 | 0.02 | .249 | .333 | .357 | .690 |
T. Hafner | 157 | 4 | 0.03 | .217 | .326 | .350 | .676 |
V. Martinez | 198 | 0 | 0.00 | .278 | .332 | .333 | .665 |
F. Gutierrez | 189 | 3 | 0.02 | .233 | .282 | .344 | .626 |
A. Marte | 51 | 0 | 0.00 | .137 | .185 | .157 | .342 |
Average: | 0.03 | .242 | .331 | .400 | .731 |
The second scenario takes the actual stats, but inserts the 2008 CHONE projections for Martinez and Hafner. There are two obvious issues here. First, I seriously doubt Hafner posts a .917 OPS in the second half. Martinez's numbers are more realistic and I'm confident he will hit the ground running when healthy. The second issue is just how bad the rest of the lineup is in comparison. Even with some overly optimistic numbers from the two DL players, the average OPS only increases by .035 points.
Keeping in mind that this .731 OPS is very rough due to the limitations discussed earlier, let's compare it to the other AL teams:
Team | R / G | OPS | BA / RISP |
Texas | 5.51 | .803 | .274 |
Boston | 5.01 | .803 | .264 |
Detroit | 4.83 | .768 | .270 |
Minnesota | 4.83 | .722 | .314 |
Chicago | 4.78 | .771 | .286 |
New York | 4.69 | .773 | .252 |
Tampa | 4.66 | .753 | .267 |
Oakland | 4.51 | .706 | .281 |
Cleveland | 4.44 | .708 | .268 |
Baltimore | 4.42 | .744 | .270 |
Anaheim | 4.29 | .708 | .279 |
Toronto | 4.14 | .725 | .243 |
While a .731 OPS would be a significant upgrade over the current .708 OPS for Cleveland, it really doesn't guarantee much in terms of overall run production. Cleveland would move up in the offensive rankings, but would still fail to crack the top six and would likely struggle to win games without some insane pitching (like Anaheim).
Since we're dealing with an average, removing the biggest outlier (Marte's .342 OPS) should tighten up the team OPS a bit. Without Marte's stats, the average OPS shoots up to .760. Even a .760 OPS is middle of the pack for the teams listed above, but would be a massive improvement on the current .708. For comparison, the team OPS in 2007 was .771.
One trend I wasn't expecting was the loose correlation between team OPS and runs scored. I added BA/RISP to try and account for this. Cleveland has one of the worst team OPS', but have been fairly efficient in driving in the few baserunners they have.
My conclusion is that even with a healthy and productive Martinez and Hafner, the Tribe's offense would still be in trouble. A lot of things will have to fall into place for this team to even hang with the top contenders. An ineffective bullpen (4.78 season ERA) and the loss of Carmona and Westbrook make relying on the pitching staff to win games a risky proposition.